• Gratis verzending
  • Al meer dan 1 miljoen studenten bestelden hier

Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discuss

Eemeren, f. van garssen, b. meuffels, b.

9789048126132 - Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discuss
2e hands

Artikelomschrijving

In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice.

Specificaties

Auteur Eemeren, f. van garssen, b. meuffels, b.
ISBN/EAN 9789048126132
Druk 1
€ 137,93 € 153,25
Verwachte bezorgdatum: 15-06

Artikelomschrijving

In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice.

Specificaties

Auteur Eemeren, f. van garssen, b. meuffels, b.
ISBN/EAN 9789048126132
Druk 1